Breadcrumb

May 4, 1972

Introduction

This almanac page for Thursday, May 4, 1972, pulls together various records created by the federal government and links to additional resources which can provide context about the events of the day.

Previous Date: Wednesday, May 3, 1972

Next Date: Friday, May 5, 1972

Schedule and Public Documents

  • The Daily Diary files represent a consolidated record of the President's activities. Visit the finding aid to learn more.

    The President's day began at The White House - Washington, D. C.

  • The Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents made available transcripts of the President's news conferences; messages to Congress; public speeches, remarks, and statements; and other Presidential materials released by the White House.

    Digitized versions can be found at HathiTrust.

  • Each Public Papers of the Presidents volume contains the papers and speeches of the President of the United States that were issued by the White House Office of the Press Secretary during the time period specified by the volume. The material is presented in chronological order, and the dates shown in the headings are the dates of the documents or events. In instances when the release date differs from the date of the document itself, that fact is shown in the text note.

    To ensure accuracy, remarks have been checked against audio recordings (when available) and signed documents have been checked against the original, unless otherwise noted. Editors have provided text notes and cross references for purposes of identification or clarity.

  • The Federal Register is the official daily publication for rules, proposed rules, and notices of federal agencies and organizations, as well as executive orders and other Presidential documents.

  • The Congressional Record is the official daily record of the debates and proceedings of the U.S. Congress.

Archival Holdings

Any selection of archival documents will necessarily be partial. You should use the documents and folders identified below as a starting place, but consult the linked collection finding aids and folder title lists and the collections themselves for context. Many documents to be found this way do not lend themselves to association with specific dates, but are essential to a complete understanding of the material.

  • Selective document listing

    President's Office Files

    The President's Office Files consists of materials drawn together by the Special Files Unit from several administrative subdivisions within the White House Office. It is the handwriting and sensitive papers sent to the Staff Secretary that now comprise much of the President's Office Files. Visit the finding aid to learn more.

    President's Personal File

    The President's Personal File is essentially a President's secretary's file, kept by Rose Mary Woods, personal secretary to the President, for two purposes: (1) preserving for posterity a collection of documents particularly close to the President, whether because he dictated or annotated them, or because of the importance of the correspondent or the event concerned and (2) giving appropriate attention–letters of gratitude, invitations to White House social events, and the like–to members and important friends and supporters of the Nixon administration. This generalization does not describe all the varied materials of a file group which is essentially a miscellany, but it does identify the reason for the existence of the file group's core. Visit the finding aid to learn more.

  • The H. R. Haldeman Diaries consists of seven handwritten diaries, 36 dictated diaries recorded as sound recordings, and two handwritten audio cassette tape subject logs. The diaries and logs reflect H. R. Haldeman’s candid personal record and reflections on events, issues, and people encountered during his service in the Nixon White House. As administrative assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, Haldeman attended and participated in public events and private meetings covering the entire scope of issues in which the Nixon White House engaged in during the years 1969-1973. Visit the finding aid to learn more.

    • Transcript of diary entry (PDF)
      Thursday, May 4.

      Hoover funeral this morning. President did the eulogy and did an extremely good job. Rest of the day was devoted to the debate over the point of the Summit cancellation. President called me in first thing this morning, said he had just gone over things with Haig; he's concerned about the public information operation in Vietnam, thinks we have to ride Laird harder on watching the news reports, that they're letting incorrect things get out and not correcting them. Then he said he wanted Kissinger and me to see Connally, give him a cold turkey briefing on the Summit situation, get his judgment, says the other possibility for conferring would be Mitchell. In any event I called Connally from his office and set up an appointment for right after the funeral, and then the President said he had an added extra ingredient in the whole thing that he had thought of last night, which is that if we cancel the Summit, we go for all the marbles, including a blockade. Then he deplored again the problem that the military are so completely unimaginative.

      He said that we should-- I should try to get Connally to stay till June 1, that he can't leave in the middle of the Soviet flap, and the war will also be in better shape by then. He's concerned that if we cancel the Soviet thing, we'll dash the hopes that we've created in the minds of people by the Soviet trip, that we'll get a very big bang against us with the Democrats on the warpath with Soviet support.

      He said he wanted me to run another poll, saying that the North Vietnamese hold 400 Americans as Prisoners of War, some for as long as five years, and they refuse to release them. Would you favor the President imposing a naval blockade on North Vietnam to be lifted only when all Prisoners of War are returned and there's a cease-fire obtained in South Vietnam? Then to add, even though this would mean United States Naval ships stopping Russian ships delivering arms to North Vietnam.

      We-- Henry and I went over and had an hour and a half meeting with Connally. Henry spent most of the time giving him the background and making the case that we were now faced with three alternatives: one, was to do nothing, and in effect back down on our bluff; second, would be to bomb the North, and Hanoi and Haiphong, with the attendant risks, including the great risk of the cancellation of the Summit; and the third would be to cancel the Summit ourselves and then follow that up by bombing the North. Before I could make the case for the other side, Connally leaped in and said he felt very strongly that under no circumstances should we cancel and then bomb the North, that people want the Soviet Summit, and we should not be in the position of cancelling it; if it's going to be canceled we should let the Soviets cancel it. He says you've got to start with the basic premise, however, that the President cannot take a military defeat in Vietnam, it's absolutely imperative that we not let this offensive succeed, so we have to do anything and everything necessary in order to deal with that. On that basis he also feels the President is now in a very good position in this country in that he's got to have the guts to meet this situation, and that we've got to make it clear to the Russians that we are not going to be defeated, and we are not going to surrender, as the President has said. In other words, the President has got to back up his public posture.

      I came back. Henry had to go on to a luncheon. I reported this to the President and he was inclined to agree with the Connally view, saying that's basically the conclusion he had already come to and that this confirmed it, that he would therefore, wanted to meet with Henry and me at 3:00 and go over the thing, so we went over to the EOB then and President made the point that he had made up his mind, that he can't lose the war, that the only mistakes-- real mistakes he had made in his Administration were the times when he had not followed his own instincts. On the EC-121 situation with North Korea, he knew we should move in and hit all their air bases but he let himself be talked out of it because Rogers and Laird both threatened to quit if he went ahead with it. After the November 3 speech, when he swung the nation behind him he should’ve moved--

      [End of tape reel AC-21(A)]

      [Begin tape reel AC-21(B)]

      I was talking about the 3:00 meeting with Henry where the President reviewed the point that the only mistakes he’d made were when he didn’t follow his instincts. On Cambodia we should've gone ahead and bombed the North at the time, although we didn't. If we had moved on that kind of move then, we wouldn't have these problems now. Same with Laos, that although there he basically did follow his instincts on this thing, it worked as well as it could have. He said that he had been thinking the thing over, and on this basis he had decided that we can't lose the war, that we're going to hit hard, that we're going to move in. The Summit is not important in this context, and that going to the Summit as a price-- by paying the price of losing in Vietnam would not be satisfactory.

      He put it very toughly to Henry. He said he'd made up his mind, didn't want any further discussion about it, didn't want to be talked out of it. Henry kept trying to interrupt, but the President went on very strongly in this vein. He obviously sensed something of the drama of the moment and was pushing his position very hard. When Henry finally did get to talk, he said that he, too, had been thinking about it, that the objectives that he came up with were the same as the President's; he agreed that we couldn't lose the war and that we had to do something. His difference, however, was that we should not move ahead with the bombing, as the President thought we should, but rather should first move to blockade Haiphong. The point being that bombing was what they were expecting and it's better to do the unexpected, first of all. Secondly, that the blockade would in some ways be a less aggressive move it's better to do the unexpected, first of all. Second, the blockade would in some ways be a less aggressive move than the bombing, although it would be a stronger signal to them and would do us more good. Henry's opposed to just a symbolic bombing, he feels that if we bomb we’ve got to do it totally, and that it would be better to blockade first and then run a continuing set of bombing. Also by blockading it gives us a little more time to keep the bombers in the South, where the military wants them during the current tough action.

      The more the President thought about it, the more he bought Henry's ideas as long as it was followed up with continued bombing, so that became his conclusion.

      He then had Connally and Haig come over and join the meeting. When they got there he reviewed the history again about not following his instincts and so forth, the point that he can't lose the war. He said we won't lose the country if we lose the Summit meeting, but we will lose the country if we lose the war. Then he said what he had decided was a blockade of Haiphong plus bombing. There was a question as to whether it’ll work, and there's a greater risk to the Summit than just bombing, but those are problems we're going to deal with.

      He then got Connally to agree with him, and gave him strong support on it. He then got into the question of whether Abrams was to be replaced, and felt that he had to be, that he was not following orders, he’s lost his steam, and so on. The decision was to replace him by sending Haig to Vietnam. Then it was decided that it wasn't such a good idea, that we'd leave Abrams there, but send Haig out for a couple of weeks as an observer for the President. Also decided to call Rogers back Sunday, since the President will announce this Monday night on television.

      After an hour and a half with that group we added Moorer, and the President very strongly put the thing to Moorer that this was his decision, that it was to be discussed with no one, especially not the Secretary, or anybody at State, or anybody over in Vietnam, but that Moorer was to put the blockade plan together, get everything ready to put it into motion so that it would take effect Tuesday morning after the President's address Monday night. He hit Moorer on the fact that this is a chance to save the military's honor and to save the country. Moorer said he could do it; he also suggested that there ought to be some offensive action by the South Vietnamese, and it was agreed they would try to mobilize enough troops, 2,000 or 3,000 for an amphibious landing north of the DMZ by North Vietnamese using our support and lift capability.

      Kissinger had to leave for a dinner. The President talked a few minutes more and then Moorer and Haig left and we kind of wrapped it up with Connally. Then the President talked with me a bit about the whole thing, feeling that he's done the right thing, that we can justify the blockade as a means of keeping lethal weapons from the hands of murderers and international outlaws, and develop that line. I think he feels good that he's made a decision and that he feels it's the right one. He also feels that it's quite a dramatic step, because it is a basic decision to go all out to win the war now, under, of course, totally different circumstances than Johnson was faced with, because we've got our troops out, we've made all the peace overtures, we've made the China trip, and laid a lot of other groundwork that should make it possible for us to do this.

      My feeling is that the public reaction here is not going to be so great on the blockade, even though it is a big move, because it's not aggressive, but the bombing that goes with it will, over a period of time, stir some people up. Some question as to what the quid pro quo will be on this, probably something to the effect that the blockade will stay on until there's a cease-fire, all POW's released. When that takes place, we'll lift the blockade and we'll remove all of our troops from South Vietnam within some time period.

      Connally was absolutely astounded at the President's description of the problems he had gone through and the other things, especially the lack of support and the lack of loyalty on the part of Laird and Rogers. I think he can't understand why the President would even keep them around and thinks it's a sign of weakness that he hadn't fired them long ago, and that he doesn't fire them now. He also strongly feels that he should pull Abrams back. The President backed off on that, and I think rightly so. Haig called me later this evening and said he thought it was a very bad idea for him to go out to Vietnam for any extended period because with a tight crunch around here he's needed to keep Henry in tow, which I totally agree with.

      End of May 4.
    • Original audio recording (MP3)
  • The National Archives Catalog is the online portal to the records held at the National Archives, and information about those records. It is the main way of describing our holdings and also provides access to electronic records and digitized versions of our holdings. 

    The Catalog searches across multiple National Archives resources at once, including archival descriptions, digitized and electronic records, authority records, and web pages from Archives.gov and the Presidential Libraries. The Catalog also allows users to contribute to digitized historical records through tagging and transcription.

    Nixon Library Holdings

    All National Archives Units

National Security Documents

Audiovisual Holdings

Context (External Sources)